Comments on: Polls are Open! Vote for SLA or ASKP http://libraryattack.com/?p=134 "Everybody's a cwitic." (I said that when I was 3.) Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:04:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Library Attack » Blog Archive » SLA is SLA, now let’s move on. http://libraryattack.com/?p=134&cpage=1#comment-469 Library Attack » Blog Archive » SLA is SLA, now let’s move on. Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:51:35 +0000 http://libraryattack.com/?p=134#comment-469 [...] last time I blogged about the SLA name change, I admitted that I voted no with reservations. I understand why people are [...] [...] last time I blogged about the SLA name change, I admitted that I voted no with reservations. I understand why people are [...]

]]> By: Ken W. http://libraryattack.com/?p=134&cpage=1#comment-446 Ken W. Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:41:40 +0000 http://libraryattack.com/?p=134#comment-446 You are not alone in this perspective, but don't let your heart be too heavy and don't burden yourself with any guilt from those guys! SLA does need "realignment" and a new name may be part of that, so if the majority vote NO on the suggested new name (as I plan to) I guess it will be up to us to come up with a better one...or a strategy to revitalize our brand. :) You are not alone in this perspective, but don’t let your heart be too heavy and don’t burden yourself with any guilt from those guys!

SLA does need “realignment” and a new name may be part of that, so if the majority vote NO on the suggested new name (as I plan to) I guess it will be up to us to come up with a better one…or a strategy to revitalize our brand. :)

]]> By: John DiGilio http://libraryattack.com/?p=134&cpage=1#comment-445 John DiGilio Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:21:18 +0000 http://libraryattack.com/?p=134#comment-445 Well said! I respect your position completely. I can't help but think that if the name change fails, it is because of much of what you have pointed out. Well said! I respect your position completely. I can’t help but think that if the name change fails, it is because of much of what you have pointed out.

]]>