http://libraryattack.com/?p=41 "Everybody's a cwitic." (I said that when I was 3.) Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:04:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://libraryattack.com/?p=41&cpage=1#comment-120 Erin Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:33:31 +0000 http://libraryattack.com/?p=41#comment-120 Kendra & Paul - Good points. I've never been on an editorial board, I just assumed that they would be the first people to know about something like that. But I guess not. It's very interesting following the controversy about this new development :) Cheers! Kendra & Paul – Good points. I’ve never been on an editorial board, I just assumed that they would be the first people to know about something like that. But I guess not. It’s very interesting following the controversy about this new development Cheers!

]]> http://libraryattack.com/?p=41&cpage=1#comment-119 Paul R. Pival Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:40:26 +0000 http://libraryattack.com/?p=41#comment-119 Erin, just 'cause AL knew it was coming doesn't mean the editorial board did. Who knows, maybe I missed a memo and am the only member of the board who didn't know. But Kendra's right - I'm supposed to read another publication to find out what's going on in mine? Erin, just ’cause AL knew it was coming doesn’t mean the editorial board did. Who knows, maybe I missed a memo and am the only member of the board who didn’t know. But Kendra’s right – I’m supposed to read another publication to find out what’s going on in mine?

]]> http://libraryattack.com/?p=41&cpage=1#comment-117 Kendra Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:42:37 +0000 http://libraryattack.com/?p=41#comment-117 Erin, nice catch with the link. I do wonder how many editorial board members would be expected to read Library Journal. I'm not sure if the board actually would have any recourse, but it seems like something with the process is broken and needs to be addressed. Erin, nice catch with the link. I do wonder how many editorial board members would be expected to read Library Journal. I’m not sure if the board actually would have any recourse, but it seems like something with the process is broken and needs to be addressed.

]]> http://libraryattack.com/?p=41&cpage=1#comment-116 Erin Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:36:25 +0000 http://libraryattack.com/?p=41#comment-116 I'm not sure how the editorial board members can say they didn't know it was coming, since it's clearly been planned for a while. It was referred to in this article by LJ on 10/6/08: http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6602272.html I’m not sure how the editorial board members can say they didn’t know it was coming, since it’s clearly been planned for a while. It was referred to in this article by LJ on 10/6/08: http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6602272.html

]]> http://libraryattack.com/?p=41&cpage=1#comment-115 oh yeah, it’s a library “science” « Attempting Elegance Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:26:44 +0000 http://libraryattack.com/?p=41#comment-115 [...] Being Annoyed with out Being Annoying [...] [...] Being Annoyed with out Being Annoying [...]

]]>